Feeds:
Posts
Comments

How do we create an education system for the City 2.0 that the TED Prize 2012 imagines? How can we learn to integrate education with innovation, culture, and economic opportunity? When might we agree to reduce the carbon footprint of City 2.0 occupants, facilitate smaller families, and ease the environmental pressure on the world’s rural areas?  What will inspire us to create  a place of beauty, wonder, excitement, inclusion, diversity, life? In short how do we learn to grow the city that works?

Integral City 2.0 knows education happens both informally and formally. Homo sapiens sapiens as a species conscious of its consciousness is a natural learning collective. Educations’ job in City 2.0 is to inquire on purpose – what makes our city work on purpose? How do we create learning capacity in, with and as citizens,  at the same time as we create learning capacity on, with and as a learning city of the planet?

City Education 2.0 embraces the cycle of life (as it emerges in individuals, in families, in cultures and neighbourhoods, the city as whole and its eco-region) to create a habitat for learning what works - as a never ending developmental journey for, with and as citizens of City 2.0.

The seeds for such an Integral Education System are emerging through the exploration of a community of learning practise. These pioneers have identified core practices for an Integral Education:

  • explore multiple perspectives – this means honouring multiple realities (as true but partial)
  • include multiple ways of learning – allow for the contributions of me, you, we and they
  • weave together the domains of self, culture and nature – respect the interconnection of people, place and planet
  • recognize the value of both critical thinking and the power of personal experience – honour logic and feeling
  • recognize learners and teachers both progress through developmental stages – create a habitat where they are aligned to take the next natural step that transforms them both
  • model and encourage personal practise – step out beyond the theory and “walk the talk” by experimenting, testing and coaching
  • embrace multiple intelligences - recognize the genius of relating as well as the genius of kinesthetics, art, math, music, spatiality ++++
  • take advantage of different types of learners and teachers – ensure learning is delivered with “different strokes for different folks”
  • don’t hide the shadows – but create the conditions for teachers and students to face and resolve dark histories, personal barriers and cultural trauma
  • honour differing approaches to education - invite in the strengths and accept the limits of traditional, wholistic, transformative, conventional and alternative approaches to learning

Read more about the history, approaches, case studies and future of Education Systems for Integral City 2.0 through the books Igniting Brilliance: Integral Education for the 21st Century and Integral Education: New Directions for Higher Learning.

References

Dea, W. (Ed.). (2010). Igniting Brilliance: Integral Education for the 21st Century. Tuscon, Arizona: Integral Publishers, LLC.

Esbjörn-Hargens, S., Reams, J., & Gunnlaugson (Eds.). (2010). Integral Education: New Directions for Higher Learning. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

How would we approach the built design for Integral City 2.0? Could we find a designer with the depths of consciousness, design repertoire, cultural acuity and systemic prowess to imagine Integral City 2.0 designs?

I propose a likely candidate would be Architect, Mark DeKay to lead us with the wisdom of Integral Sustainable Design. In fact he has just written a book by that very title. DeKay speaks to the three audiences that an Integral City 2.0 design must attract.  Firstly he addresses the scholars of Integral Theory to explore the principles of Design. Secondly, he invokes the Sustainability stewards of City 2.0 to appreciate the fundamentals of wholism, living systems, systems thinking and ecology. Thirdly he calls forth the designers and students of design and architecture who will design the built City 2.0.

I had been waiting for Mark DeKay’s book for a long time before TED’s City 2.0 was announced. (In fact as author of Integral City: Evolutionary Intelligences for the Human Hive I wish that DeKay’s book had been published before my own was written.) Now I see DeKay’s book as a necessary guide for imagining and building Integral City 2.0.

The book’s four parts focus first on the Perspectives of Integral Design. The second looks at Levels of Complexity, exploring the developmental path of the Design view. The third examines Ecological Design Thinking with an insightful look at shift thinking from linear to non-linear perceptions. The fourth part explores the Relationship of Design to Nature from five developmental levels.

From the Integral Discourse a full text of my review of DeKay’s book is available in Journal of Integral Theory and Pratice, Volume 6, Issue 3.

From the Design Discourse, a new review by Lisa Norton in metropolismagazine has just expressed appreciation for DeKay’s mastery of a whole new paradigm applied to the field of architecture. Norton explains:  “we might say that every epoch has its architectural dignities as well as its architectural disasters, evolving and in turn transcending what proves un-resourceful, while incorporating what is valuable. DeKay’s book skillfully details precisely such developments and anticipates future possibilities for designers of habitus. His skillful choice of a range of contemporary and historical examples, drawn from every continent, elucidates what an integral approach to designing for sustainability might look like.”

With duly noted caution, Norton admits “until this book, no author had connected the dots from the still-emergent field of integral theory to design in such a way as to give clear instructions for its application, particularly to sustainable architectural practice. Integral Sustainable Design is a vivid map with examples, that offers possible reasons for why existing approaches to sustainable architecture do not reliably deliver the catalytic outcomes that one would expect given the overall promise of and excitement around whole systems design for architecture and urban studies. In fact, this book can be seen as a kind of explanation for the failure of sustainable design in general to really take root, thrive, and achieve that widely anticipated and catalytic social tipping point.” (Readers can read the full review here.)

That’s the Integral Sustainable Design tipping point that cities would need to evolve their built form into Integral City 2.0.

References

DeKay, M. (2011). Integral Sustainable Design: Transformative Perspectives. London, UK: Earthscan.

Hamilton, M. (2011). Integral Sustainable Design, Book Review Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 6(3), 137-148. Retrieved from ttp://aqaljournal.integralinstitute.org/public/Issues.aspx

Hamilton, M. (2008). Integral City: Evolutionary Intelligences for the Human Hive. Gabriola Island BC: New Society Publishers.

Norton, L. (2012). Integral Sustainable Design, Book Review. metropolismag.com. Retrieved from http://www.metropolismag.com/pov/20120113/integral-sustainable-design

There is a crack in everything, that’s how the light gets in. Leonard Cohen

If City 2.0 is to support more life-giving options for behaviours, intentions, cultures and systems, City Economics 2.0 will have to emerge as an integral part of the whole.

A pessimist would say we have been witnessing the disintegration of the old economy in the last ten+ years with the waves of meltdowns surging across the globe like tsunamis, engulfing in turn Asian Tigers, Japan,  Southern Asia, BRIC, USA, PIGS, Europe.

An optimist might way we are witnessing a whole new economy being born – like a new life emerging from an egg that is cracking open. The tsunamis are merely the result of  new life pushing to the surface, seeking light as people outgrow the old systems that enabled survival but now curtail the next natural stage of emergence. The Occupy movements and their cousins are pecking away at the old shells, too brittle now to hold the flex and flow needed to nurture City 2.0.

The new economics is being created from the bottom up and the top down at the same time. We are growing a whole new metabolic system for City 2.0.  Christian Arnsperger’s Eco-Transitions describes an eco-system with processes for exchange that are more reasonable, more ecologically viable  and more socially equitable. Long a visionary voice for the invisible economy and the champion of an ecologically balanced and socially responsible economy Hazel Henderson has been developing systems, investment vehicles and metrics for the new economy for decades. Other economic voices like MacLeod and even the Euro’s ”father” Bernard Litaer are dialoguing with regional experts like Gwendolyn Hallsmith  call for multiple currencies that can co-exist in cities for different purposes and different markets. Values-based economic pioneers like Said Dawlabani  recognizes that “memenomics” explains the natural stratification of wealth that emerges along with the values systems (Vmemes) of societies.

Actually new wealth is emerging because people are inventing not just new economies but ecologies of economies that break open the hard shells created by the old banking systems, national governments and organizational oligarchies.

As Integral City 2.0 emerges a lot of light is breaking through. City 2.0 is going to have to accustom itself to the glare and learn how to dance in it.

New research shows the power of the web to spread diversity and infect conformity by the provocation of weak signals. Farhad Manjoo from Slate reconsiders his(?) book True Enough’s proposition that the web was narrowing networkers’ worlds to the news/info selections that they chose. Now Facebook has released a study with an interesting design (based on millions of participants) that shows users’ worlds are actually expanded – not because of frequent exchanges with close friends –  but because of unexpected encounters with distant acquaintances – the so-called weak signals in the study.

Building on my dissertation research on Leadership & Learning in Self-Organizing Systems, I found that Leaders were the participants in the system who could initiate a weak signal and grow a new pattern from it. Leaders could also amplify a weak signal created by another(s) and create (or co-create) a pattern that could impact and change the perspectives of the conformity enforcers (who defined the system norms).

City Leaders now have at their disposal both the Art and Science of quickening collective intelligence in their Human Hive.  The Art allows them to create and co-create patterns through collaborating with both Diversity Generators and Conformity Enforcers. While the Science draws on the meshworks emerging from the dynamics of self-organizing systems.

City Leaders now have technology that not only amplifies weak signals but with evolutionary inspiration, they can quicken the spread of collective intelligence.

Integral City has blasted into outer space! Or at least sub-orbital flight.

Teaming up with astronaut, Dr. Mindy Howard, we are contributing to the Next Generation Sub-orbital Research Conference (Feb 27-29 Palo Alto).  Check out Mindy and team’s itinerary for blast off under Flight Training Peak Experience: Optimizing the Conditions of Inner Space for Outer Space.

This is a new opportunity for Integral City 2.0 to contribute to the emergence of Evolutionary Intelligences for the human hive, through experimenting with Inner Space so we can be successful in Outer Space. We imagined this kind of endeavour would evolve City 2.0 (3.0, 4.0 ++) on this benign planet in order to gain the skills we need for crafting space colonies in Chapter 12 of the Integral City book  (listen to Chapter 12 of the book here).

This approach to evolution reminds us that our inner mind spaces are the real launching pads for attaining sustainable orbits in outer space at any Kosmic address.

The Integral City 2.0 embraces and develops human systems.

It draws on the frameworks of complex human development of Ken Wilber, Don Beck, Clare Graves and Ervin Laszlo; living systems theory of James Grier Miller; ecological sustainability of William Rees and Mathis Wackernagel; resilience models of C.S. Holling et al; and bio-social-evolutionist dynamics of Jared Diamond , Spencer Wells, Howard Bloom , Elisabet Sahtouris and Barbara Marx Hubbard .

Integral City 2.0 is dynamic, adaptive and responsive to its internal life conditions and external life conditions. Integral City 2.0 tracks these conditions using three intertwined images:

These images show Integral City 2.0 as a whole living system, evolving because of the dynamic human relationships that define its boundaries, expand its connections and grow its intelligence as Gaia’s reflective organ.

An Integral City is a complex adaptive human system that concentrates habitat for humans like a bee hive does for bees.

As a natural system it faces all the same issues, factors and challenges that affect the concentration of life anywhere: sustaining flows of information, matter and energy for the survival of human life. Serving these three major systems, an Integral City has the same integrative sub-systems identified by Miller’s trans-scale research that show up in six levels of hierarchical complexity from cell to organ to individual to team to organization to society to city-state.

The Human Hive image is a way to see the city as a whole system where the resilience cycle (of Holling et al) emerges  through the living system in the four stages of conservation, breakdown, re-distribution and exploitation. This happens because the four key roles of people in the city system respond to life conditions by shifting the strength of their influences for survival, linking to the environment and generativity/reproduction.  One way to define these roles is that of: conformity enforcers, diversity generators, resource allocators and inner judges.

The value-added of the bee hive is that it serves a double sustainability loop ensuring resilience for the bees and the plants and trees they pollinate in the fields and forests (aka eco-region)  from which the hive renews itself year after year. (And incidentally produces $90bb worth of agricultural for humans.)

The value-added of the Human Hive would be the same on a city eco-regional scale (and eventually global scale) where we would serve a double sustainability loop ensuring resilience for humans and wellbeing for the eco-region/system from which the Human Hive renews itself.

How we could accomplish this would be to use the 12 intelligences that we already have evolved.

What would Integral City contribute to TED’s City 2.0 prize?

City 2.0 is differentiated from City 1.0 primarily because it moves from being inward oriented to being outward oriented. City 1.0 cares for its residents (on good days) while Integral City 2.0 cares for the world by caring for its citizens and stewarding its place and space on behalf of Gaia.

Integral City 2.0 frames the city as Gaia’s Reflective Organ.  Integral City 2.0 has Gaia’s reflective capacity embedded in its 12 Integral City intelligences . Integral City’s 2.0 meta-intelligence reflects a trajectory of caring capacity (not just carrying capacity) that expands from self-care to other-care to caring for this place. The core of TED City 2.0 would pulse with the consciousness and spirit of Integral City’s reflective organ in service to Gaia’s organic wellbeing.

Consumerism is to our society what cancer is to our body, said Michael Dowd at the Integral Spiritual Experience. He brings attention to our evolutionary conundrum – why would we consume the reources of the planet in the same way that cancer cells consume the energy of the body?

But how can we measure when we are in the zone of adequate sufficiency? Christian Arnsperger of Eco-Transitions suggests that Existential Ecological Economics – an economics that examines the roots of prosperity and happiness might offer a measuring stick. He says: “Economics ought to be about nothing else than maintaining human beings between … two thresholds — [where prosperity emerges because we are] neither too despondent nor too affluent.”

Christian places the lower threshold A, as lacking in economic infrastructure. The upper threshold B, is the reality where we are overwhelmed by economic infrastructure. He explains further: “Below A, your existential integration is bad-to-mediocre because of sheer lack, and it improves only slowly as you get somewhat less poor, picking up speed as you reach threshold A. Between A and B, you can develop your potential for existential integration by actually using the economic infrastructure to enhance your integration — that is, by using health care and transport and clothing and food to pursue and perfect your relationships, sexuality, religious quest, and so on. Above B, however, as material wealth continues to climb your existential integration dwindles, and you might get so caught up in the absurdities of large wealth that you could drop to pre-A integration levels. The factors that account for these threshold effects can either be linked to (a) the unanticipated external effects of infrastructure buildup, such as the degradation of social relations and the degradation of environmental conditions; or they can be linked to (b) the unconscious internal effects of infrastructure buildup, such as the alienation suffered in meaningless work, in mindless accumulation, or in mechanical consumption. ([Christian calls] the former “bio-environmental externalities” and the latter ‘anthropo-environmental internalities.’ ” (Read the whole blog here.)

It seems then, that we must be aware of both external and internal measures of consumerism and the “sweet spot” that is the zone for genuine happiness and prosperity. This kind of intelligent mindfulness might eradicate the cancer of both body and planet.

2011 may be the tipping point that globally shifted all the Pillars of Sustainability. By year-end each leans as precariously as four Towers of Pisa.

First we watched the Environmental Pillar reign tsunami terror on the city of Sendai, followed by the infrastructural meltdown of the Fukushima nuclear plants, sending shock waves throughout the worldwide energy sector.

Before we caught our breath the Economic meltdown of the EU sent shivers of 2008 deja-vu around the financial world, expanding uncertainty and contracting portfolios of wealth.

Simultaneously the Social Pillar caught fire during the Arab Spring, spreading from Tunisia to Egypt to Libya and Yemen and still raging in Syria, the Straits of Hormuz and once again at the gas pump.

Finally the Cultural Pillar Occupied Wall Street and city centres around the world, challenging positions of power with perspectives of unfairness.

Energy, Matter and Information are being recalibrated above, below and around every Pillar. Sustainability itself has been occupied in very new ways.

Older Posts »