Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Middle East’


The weak signals that diasporas emit into and outside of systems reported earlier this week is the subject of a new book. Parag Khanna, a Distinguished Visitor at the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto has just released “How to Run the World”.

Excerpts in today’s National Post read:

“In the Middle Ages, diverse merchant communities were a driving force of diplomacy, managing to translate languages, exchange currencies, and trade a cornucopia of goods across Eurasia. … Corporations now have the grand strategies just like countries. … Technology and finance have torn apart the relationship between borders and identity. … What will the politics of Arab monarchies look like if the Indian government starts demanding a political voice for its millions of guest workers who outnumber the local populations by five to one?”

One wonders what kinds of inter-group tournaments are on the verge of emerging between human hives and national clusters of human hives?

Read the whole excerpt here: Our Ne0-Medieval World

Read Full Post »


The watch continues as events unfold in North African and the Middle Eastern cities and countries. We wonder whether and how autocracies in these places may be superseded by autocracy, theocracy or even democracy? Each country is different so most informed observers don’t expect that a single solution will emerge across all countries.

From the outside of this area, all we can see right now are the surface behaviours. The real sources of change are entrenched four, five, even six deep below the surface, in the social systems, cultures, family beliefs, individual psyches and even the genes of the people who are in the midst of this massive collective shift.

Maybe there are also other factors at play as well?  I would point to two possibilities, both having to do with the intermixing of cultures. One is the sizable ex-patriot populations that we see fleeing Egypt, Tunisia, Libya (and to a lesser extent the Mid East). These people will bring direct experience of the countries in turmoil and share their stories with the parts of the world to which they return or flee.  These ex-pats will influence attitudes, behaviours, policy decisions, cultural outreach (or distancing) and personal intentions.

The other possible influence comes from the other direction - it is the large Diasporas that have emigrated from Egypt, Libya and Tunisia to Europe and North America. They have experienced democracy and many have returned home to stoke the flames of rebellion and revolution. But many still remain behind in their new home countries.

The scale of these current day emmigrations (particularly when the EU, UK and Canada have had such inviting immigration policies) has been experienced before in history when invading armies have impelled peoples to flee in advance, thus spreading cultures like a wave into adjoining lands. But today’s Diasporas are spread half a world away and are adapting and growing up in democracies, mainlining its dignities and disasters.

What can this mean for the Diasporas’ countries of origin? Might it be possible that the diaspora can and will act as accelerators to the development and evolution of their cultures and countries of origin? Might we hope that the development of tribal cultures through the stages of lawful governance and freer trade could be accelerated because of the influence of a returning diaspora who will import changed beliefs, wider worldviews, greater technological systems, and more informed behaviours?

Might we even consider arming the (inevitable) return of the ex-patriots to North Africa and the Middle East with resources that enable the natural development out of tribal cultures into more complex cultures? Resources like education for girls and women. Resources that enable food security and sustainable existence. Resources that promote micro-finance and freer trade to enable prosperous economic exchanges?

It’s just a thought. Maybe the two-way transitions of ex-patriot workers and diaspora emigres have the potential to accelerate the natural development of worldviews, cultures, structural systems,  and much expanded options for healthy behaviours ?? It is interesting to consider how such influences could improve our capacities to take care of our selves, take care of each other and take care of our places (and Place).

Read Full Post »


Further to my blog from Feb. 23, the National Post runs a most informative analysis by Chip Pitts of Stanford Law School and National Post’s Aileen Donnelly entitled Ripe for Revolt? Who Might Fall.

Their analysis not only takes into account the internet users, but also cell phones in the countries of North Africa and the Middle East. The level of cell phone usage in some countries even appears to exceed the population!! (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, UAE).

Coupled with the Democracy Index (generally in the sub-sub basement), Military Spending and Corruption Score (generally in the super-super attic) the analysts propose whether revolution is likely and their estimation of the possibility of success. What they don’t say is what defines success???? It would be clearer if this could be determined in relation to the next natural developmental step for each country. Ah well … the analysis is brilliant anyway … and we will just have to stay tuned to see how the country might define success.

Read Full Post »


Some years ago I heard Lynne Twist talk about “changing the dream of the North”. It was an invocation given to her by the Achuar people of the upper Amazon. When I heard this story, it made my spine tingle as I grokked that this intention had powers to embrace my own work.

These last few weeks, it has been the cities in the south – the tropics and the sub-tropics that have grabbed the headline news with the revolutions and rebellions that are ripping across North Africa and the Middle East. I am wondering how the changes that they are experiencing will impact the “dream of the north”?

What is the “dream of the north” anyway?  Is it the old colonial (pre-modern) dream of accessing the rich resources of the south? Is it the related dream of using the massive populations of the south to access these resources and send those raw materials to the north for manufacture and re-distribution to the south? Is it a more modern dream of reaching out to the south and exporting our manual labour jobs so that manufacture itself can be outsourced at low labour rates? Is it the more post-modern dream of offering to the south the knowledge worker professional jobs that they can now fulfil through high-tech communications and IT at low contract fees?

Through this lens, it would appear that the “dream of the north” is one that is largely focused on the economy, with a strong assumption that environmental resources are available to whoever has the economic power.

But when we look at today’s rebellious cities in North Africa and the Middle East, the dreams their citizens are demanding to be changed are social/cultural realities. They are overthrowing autocracies, theocracies and military overlords. And as the conflicts ripple around Gaia’s sub-tropical girth we are witnessing the impacts the social/cultural disruptions are having on the economy (and by extension the environment).

Looking at the human hives of the south – I am now beginning to wonder, if they hold the key to changing the “dream of the north”??  It appears that we are witnessing the great intersecting elements of the sustainability equation – the environment, the economy, the social systems and cultural worldviews - at play in the cities of the south and all the ripple effects they are having on the city dreams of the north. And when the outcomes of all these shifts become more apparent, we may wake up one day to find that the “dream of the north” has been changed by the cities of the south.

Read Full Post »


Events in Egypt this last week show how the consciousness of people  in the rural area that serves cities can ignite a whole culture. The amazing pictures of hundreds of thousands marching in Cairo and the Mubarak government’s progressive retreat in the face of the population’s fearless demands mark what the media call a “regime change”.

The question is, whether this regime change will merely be a shift from one para-military dictatorship to another, or from a dictatorship to some form of democracy? Dr. Don Beck often says, “be careful that you don’t confuse getting rid of what you don’t want, for getting what you do want”. 

What do Egyptians really want? Will it align with what the rest of the world wants it to want? Because as Ross Douthat has noted, the desires of the USA, Israel and Iran (to name a few interested nations) about Egypt, have not aligned for some time.

The dilemma faced by Egypt is one of growing up. Ironically this tinder box was lit by a young farmer in Tunisia, who merely wanted to sell fresh produce in the city. He was so angry at the refusal of authorities to allow him to pursue his perceived rights, that he literally torched himself – and set in motion a self-organizing inflammation that spread from country to city and city to city and now nation to nation.

The growing up that Egyptians seem to be demanding is the right to free elections and a government that represents their interests for the basics of life. But the world is witnessing Egypt’s challenge like an extended family witnesses the coming of age of a teenager. Will this teenager grow into more self-responsibility or regress into less self-responsibility. The cabal of nation-aunts-uncles-cousins-brothers-sisters-mothers-and-fathers are all holding our breaths to see what the next natural step of development Egypt will grow into?

And this holding our breath – instead of rushing in with a certainty that we know how to fix the situation is hopefully a sign that this extended family has maybe learned a lesson or two, about allowing cities and nations to determine what is the next natural step of development for them. Because you can’t parachute in a fix from the outside that will offer any long term resiliency – you can, at best, support the conditions for developmental capacities to grow themselves. It is a home grown coming of age that is needed most. So whatever the change – be it revolutionary or evolutionary – we must hope that Egyptians themselves can plant it, grow it, nurture it, and own it.

Who knew a humble vegetable plot could sprout such an energizing shift? This story may turn out to be the equivalent cultural shift for the Middle East as Rosa Parks was for the USA?

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 779 other followers

%d bloggers like this: